Securing sensitive data in transit, such as financial transactions, medical records, intellectual property, federal or military communications is a high priority for enterprises and government organizations. This information must be kept safe as a matter of privacy, legal compliance, economic stability and even national security. As threats to our communications evolve, so too must our defenses.
As quantum computing and sophisticated AI attacks threaten to break traditional encryption methods, hybrid key exchange emerges as a critical strategy for maintaining secure communications. By combining multiple cryptographic approaches, organizations can create robust defense mechanisms against both current and future cyber threats.
Hybrid key exchange combines multiple key exchange mechanisms to generate a composite encryption key. The primary goal is to ensure security remains intact even if one of the component keys is compromised. For example, a hybrid system might combine a legacy classical encryption method like RSA with an entanglement-based quantum key distribution scheme such as BBM92. If an adversary breaks only the RSA component key, the composite key remains secure. Hybrid key exchange offers a practical way to maintain strong protection today while building up quantum resilience.
To make an informed decision, it helps to first understand the major categories of key exchange:
Legacy Schemes
Built on public key cryptography, these schemes (e.g., RSA, DH, ECDH) have protected against classical threats for decades, but they are vulnerable to quantum attacks such as those enabled by Shor’s algorithm.
Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
PQC algorithms are designed to resist both classical and quantum threats using mathematical problems that are presumed to be difficult for quantum computers to solve. ML-KEM is the first NIST-standardized PQC algorithm for key exchange.
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)
Based on prepare-and-measure quantum protocols (e.g., BB84), QKD offers quantum-secure key exchange with perfect forward secrecy and information theoretic security. However, it depends on trusted nodes for long-distance use and is typically limited to just one application.
Quantum Secure Communications (QSC)
These entanglement-based protocols (e.g., E91, BBM92) also provide quantum-secure key exchange with perfect forward secrecy and information-theoretic security, but without requiring trusted relays for long-distance use. QSC is considered a more advanced technology than QKD, offering multiple enhanced applications beyond just key distribution.Each method has unique advantages and limitations in terms of maturity, performance, and deployment complexity.
Guidance for your hybrid classical-quantum key exchange
The ideal hybrid scheme leverages independent strengths and independent weaknesses from its components. This design ensures:
-
Redundancy: If one scheme fails, the other can still protect the data.
-
Broader protection: Against both known and unforeseen attack vectors.
-
Future-proofing: Legacy schemes ensure near-term resilience; quantum-secure schemes guard against long-term threats.
A robust hybrid key exchange scheme should include at least one quantum-secure component (PQC, QKD, or QSC). It should use a legacy scheme (RSA, ECDH) if you're operating in an environment with current classical constraints, such as compliance standards that don’t address quantum threats, and to maintain security during the transitory period before fully adopting a quantum-secure solution. Also, it’s best to choose components with complementary vulnerabilities, avoiding shared points of failure.
After selecting your component schemes, you'll need to securely combine the keys they produce. The method you choose should align with performance needs, key format constraints, and desired cryptographic strength. Common methods include:
-
Concatenation: Simple and interoperable, but may require additional formatting.
-
XOR: Secure and efficient, but requires keys of the same length.
-
Key Derivation Functions (KDFs): Flexible and secure, suitable for adapting keys to required formats
-
Hybrid Methods: Combining any of the above techniques (concatenation, XOR, KDFs) for maximum adaptability and security.
Different combinations of hybrid key exchange are useful in different contexts. For example, a transition period hybrid, used while an organization is adjusting its security posture, could be combining Legacy + PQC. This combination ensures security today while preparing for tomorrow. A forward-looking hybrid, like combining PQC + QSC, is quantum-safe with added benefits like perfect forward secrecy, information-theoretic security, and eavesdropper protection. A method with maximum redundancy for high-assurance environments, such as defense contexts, could use Legacy + PQC + QSC
As attacks become more advanced due to AI and quantum computation, organizations must proactively develop flexible, multi-layered security strategies. Hybrid key exchange is a strategic solution for a dynamic and uncertain cryptographic future. By carefully selecting and combining the right components, organizations can ensure a high level of protection of sensitive data against both current and next-generation threats.
For more details on this topic please see our on-demand webinar, Hybrid Classical-Quantum Key Exchange: Maximizing Security.
